[jdf-dev] JBoss Stacks site update

[Rafael Benevides]

All,

I added the archetypes info on Stacks page.

I tried 3 different approaches to show the Archetypes:

- Archetypes on another page (information became diffuse)
- Tree Table (too confusing, polluted)
- Overlay (actual - I liked that)

I took a link to 
http://www.jboss.org/jdf/quickstarts/jboss-as-quickstart/guide/Archetype/ on 
Archetype info

Please, consider another review at http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/stacks/


Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Brazil
+55-61-9269-6576

Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com


Em 25-07-2012 17:21, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
> Thanks for your tips Pete. It was really awesome
>
> New release - with your commits rebased :) - to review
>
> <http://localhost:4242/stack/runtimes/>http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/ 
>
> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat Brazil
> +55-61-9269-6576
>
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
> See how it works at redhat.com
>
> Em 25-07-2012 07:26, Pete Muir escreveu:
>> Onhttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>>
>> * the code samplle indentation is probably wrong, I think it should just be left aligned.
>> * You have a trailing full stop in the code sample
>> * Maybe we should experiment with a table for the layout, rather than the accordion? not sure.
>> * the "Description:" is probably redundant, the layout of the page makes it obvious that it's a description ;-)
>> * maybe we should make the Usage h3 or h4, it's a bit distracting right now
>> * We've lost the info on plugins needing to be copied in from the BOMs readmes
>>
>> Onhttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/runtimes/
>>
>> * I would prefer to present this all in one table, rather than multiple tabs by type
>> * We should present newest server first, not last (descending order)
>> * Normally the code name of the server goes in parentheses
>> * Links to BOMs should open the right accordion/tab
>> * I wonder if we should call it "Suggested Runtime" "Suggested BOM", "Suggested Archetype"
>> * Download URL isn't a URL, it's a link. Suggest you change to "Download" and then use one of the glyphicons for in the table
>> * I would like to be able to expand a row, and see all the available BOMs and archetypes, and also all available versions of said BOMs and archetypes
>>
>> http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/plugin-jdf/
>>
>> * Something has gone wrong with the markdown, links aren't being correctly created
>> * I'll send a pull with some suggested changes to the README source
>>
>> On 25 Jul 2012, at 02:24, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>
>>> Hi ALL
>>>
>>> After digging the awestruct/ruby/haml world I update the JDF site to read the jboss-stack yaml file
>>>
>>> So I created a new section named JBoss Stacks that's what we have been calling it.
>>>
>>> This new section contains:
>>>      - The JBoss boms (from yaml file -https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/Beta2/stacks.yaml)
>>>      - The Runtime matrix (Major Releases, Minor Releases and some Runtime data - also read from yaml file)
>>>      - A page about JDF plugin (from README.md)
>>>      - PLANED: Archetypes data
>>>
>>> This new section is athttp://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/   - I'll thank for any review and just to know: My designer skill is terrible :p
>>>
>>>
>>> P.S: Pete Muir heard something about "JBoss Stacks" is an overloaded name. I don't think that we should change it but if someone have any name idea, it will be welcome.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>>> Red Hat Brazil
>>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>>
>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jdf-dev/attachments/20120730/2b406320/attachment.html