[jdf-dev] JBoss Stacks site update

Pete Muir pmuir at redhat.com
Mon Jul 30 10:00:45 EDT 2012


This is great.

* The archetype version in the code used to run the archetype is wrong, it should be drawn from the "recommended archetype version" I guess?
* It would be nice to be able to click on the other versions, and have the command updated
* Suggested archetype should be the war archetype, not the ear archetype :-)

Now that I see the modal dialog in use, I wonder if we should do the same for the BOMs?

On 30 Jul 2012, at 14:22, Rafael Benevides wrote:

> All,
> 
> I added the archetypes info on Stacks page. 
> 
> I tried 3 different approaches to show the Archetypes:
> 
> - Archetypes on another page (information became diffuse)
> - Tree Table (too confusing, polluted)
> - Overlay (actual - I liked that)
> 
> I took a link to http://www.jboss.org/jdf/quickstarts/jboss-as-quickstart/guide/Archetype/ on Archetype info
> 
> Please, consider another review at http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/stacks/
> 
> 
> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat Brazil
> +55-61-9269-6576
> 
> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. 
> See how it works at redhat.com
> 
> 
> Em 25-07-2012 17:21, Rafael Benevides escreveu:
>> Thanks for your tips Pete. It was really awesome
>> 
>> New release - with your commits rebased :) - to review
>> 
>> http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>> Red Hat Brazil
>> +55-61-9269-6576
>> 
>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. 
>> See how it works at redhat.com
>> 
>> 
>> Em 25-07-2012 07:26, Pete Muir escreveu:
>>> On http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> * the code samplle indentation is probably wrong, I think it should just be left aligned. 
>>> * You have a trailing full stop in the code sample
>>> * Maybe we should experiment with a table for the layout, rather than the accordion? not sure.
>>> * the "Description:" is probably redundant, the layout of the page makes it obvious that it's a description ;-)
>>> * maybe we should make the Usage h3 or h4, it's a bit distracting right now
>>> * We've lost the info on plugins needing to be copied in from the BOMs readmes
>>> 
>>> On 
>>> http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/runtimes/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> * I would prefer to present this all in one table, rather than multiple tabs by type
>>> * We should present newest server first, not last (descending order)
>>> * Normally the code name of the server goes in parentheses
>>> * Links to BOMs should open the right accordion/tab
>>> * I wonder if we should call it "Suggested Runtime" "Suggested BOM", "Suggested Archetype"
>>> * Download URL isn't a URL, it's a link. Suggest you change to "Download" and then use one of the glyphicons for in the table
>>> * I would like to be able to expand a row, and see all the available BOMs and archetypes, and also all available versions of said BOMs and archetypes
>>> 
>>> 
>>> http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/plugin-jdf/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> * Something has gone wrong with the markdown, links aren't being correctly created
>>> * I'll send a pull with some suggested changes to the README source
>>> 
>>> On 25 Jul 2012, at 02:24, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Hi ALL
>>>> 
>>>> After digging the awestruct/ruby/haml world I update the JDF site to read the jboss-stack yaml file
>>>> 
>>>> So I created a new section named JBoss Stacks that's what we have been calling it.
>>>> 
>>>> This new section contains:
>>>>     - The JBoss boms (from yaml file - 
>>>> https://github.com/jboss-jdf/jdf-stack/blob/Beta2/stacks.yaml
>>>> )
>>>>     - The Runtime matrix (Major Releases, Minor Releases and some Runtime data - also read from yaml file)
>>>>     - A page about JDF plugin (from README.md)
>>>>     - PLANED: Archetypes data
>>>> 
>>>> This new section is at 
>>>> http://site-jdf.rhcloud.com/stack/boms/
>>>>   - I'll thank for any review and just to know: My designer skill is terrible :p
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> P.S: Pete Muir heard something about "JBoss Stacks" is an overloaded name. I don't think that we should change it but if someone have any name idea, it will be welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> 
>>>> Rafael Benevides | Senior Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat Brazil
>>>> +55-61-9269-6576
>>>> 
>>>> Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration. 
>>>> See how it works at redhat.com
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>>> 
>>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> 
>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jdf-dev mailing list
> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev




More information about the jdf-dev mailing list