[jdf-dev] [new organization] BOMs repository split

[Emmanuel Bernard]

I don't know. Can you mixin BOMs or are they rigidly hierarchical?

On 5 juil. 2013, at 18:09, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:

> So, do we have a -with-hibernate-orm and -with-hibernate-search BOM?
> 
> On 5 Jul 2013, at 16:40, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri 2013-07-05 11:47, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>> As part of the plan, the BOMs will be splited according to its product: 
>>> EAP or WFK
>>> 
>>> Today there are some BOMs that is distributed in both products. My 
>>> question is what we should do about them? Move it to EAP or move it to WFK?
>>> 
>>> The worst if keeping it in both repos.
>>> 
>>> These are the boms that have release on eap 6.1 and wfk 2.2
>>> 
>>> - with-deltaspike
>>> - with-errai
>>> - with-hibernate
>> 
>> With Hibernate ORM being at the center of EAP's persistence
>> implementation, ORM should be in a BOM shared by anyone seeding off EAP.
>> 
>> Hibernate Search being used by WFK, Data Services and JBoss Data Grid
>> it's quite more complicated but again some "common libs" used by a
>> common set of versions of EAP, WFK and SOA.
>> But I'm sure, at least initially that we will need to have some
>> exceptions esp until the search support for JDG matures enough.
>> 
>> It's somehow tied ot the layered architecture and the idea of a core
>> shared by compatible platforms.
>> 
>> That's a general view but we should discuss on email (or if we have to
>> on a call) the exact requirements and needs of these BOMs to come to the
>> proper solution.
>> 
>> Emmanuel
>> _______________________________________________
>> jdf-dev mailing list
>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>