[jdf-dev] [new organization] BOMs repository split
Pete Muir
pmuir at redhat.com
Fri Jul 5 13:50:33 EDT 2013
Both mixins and inheritance are supported.
On 5 Jul 2013, at 17:31, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
> I don't know. Can you mixin BOMs or are they rigidly hierarchical?
>
> On 5 juil. 2013, at 18:09, Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> So, do we have a -with-hibernate-orm and -with-hibernate-search BOM?
>>
>> On 5 Jul 2013, at 16:40, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri 2013-07-05 11:47, Rafael Benevides wrote:
>>>> As part of the plan, the BOMs will be splited according to its product:
>>>> EAP or WFK
>>>>
>>>> Today there are some BOMs that is distributed in both products. My
>>>> question is what we should do about them? Move it to EAP or move it to WFK?
>>>>
>>>> The worst if keeping it in both repos.
>>>>
>>>> These are the boms that have release on eap 6.1 and wfk 2.2
>>>>
>>>> - with-deltaspike
>>>> - with-errai
>>>> - with-hibernate
>>>
>>> With Hibernate ORM being at the center of EAP's persistence
>>> implementation, ORM should be in a BOM shared by anyone seeding off EAP.
>>>
>>> Hibernate Search being used by WFK, Data Services and JBoss Data Grid
>>> it's quite more complicated but again some "common libs" used by a
>>> common set of versions of EAP, WFK and SOA.
>>> But I'm sure, at least initially that we will need to have some
>>> exceptions esp until the search support for JDG matures enough.
>>>
>>> It's somehow tied ot the layered architecture and the idea of a core
>>> shared by compatible platforms.
>>>
>>> That's a general view but we should discuss on email (or if we have to
>>> on a call) the exact requirements and needs of these BOMs to come to the
>>> proper solution.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> jdf-dev mailing list
>>> jdf-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jdf-dev
>>
More information about the jdf-dev
mailing list