[jsfunit-dev] patched cactus and ant example application

Matt Wringe mwringe at redhat.com
Fri May 18 16:39:34 EDT 2007


On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 16:25 -0400, Stan Silvert wrote:
> Matt Wringe wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have the patched cactus ant jars and have also created an ant build
> > file that takes the hellojsf webapp and adds the jsfunit bits [I also
> > have a very small doc about how to use the ant with jsfunit].
> > 
> 
> Great.  Will we still need a patch if we change to a Filter solution as 
> I just described here?
> http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4046925#4046925
If we use the filter approach I don't think we will need any patches.

> 
> > I have a couple of questions:
> > 1) where should the patched cactus jars go?
> 
> If we need a patch for cactify I'll push a binary to the web site for 
> download.  But we won't check it into the main project unless the Cactus 
> team refuses to do a release.
> 
> > 2) I would like to get the ant example into svn, but I am a bit unsure
> > about a couple of things. Would it be ok to set it up like other ant
> > projects and put its dependency jars into svn? Or to set it up to use
> > the Maven tasks for ant so that dependencies and such come from the
> > maven repo? I currently have it setup as a bit of both (it grabs some of
> > the jars from the repo, but it won't download them if they are not in
> > the repo).
> 
> Yes, we definitely want your ant example in the main project.  I'd 
> rather not have any dependent jars in SVN if we can help it.  I don't 
> think it adds any value to show developers how to set that part up.
> 
> So I would prefer using the Maven tasks for ant to make dependencies 
> come from the mave repo.
Yeah, I like that idea better, I never really liked the idea of having
jars in version control. 

> 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Matt Wringe
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > jsfunit-dev mailing list
> > jsfunit-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jsfunit-dev
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsfunit-dev/attachments/20070518/b0af1cba/attachment.bin 


More information about the jsfunit-dev mailing list