[jsfunit-dev] patched cactus and ant example application

[Stan Silvert]

Matt Wringe wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have the patched cactus ant jars and have also created an ant build
> file that takes the hellojsf webapp and adds the jsfunit bits [I also
> have a very small doc about how to use the ant with jsfunit].
> 

Great.  Will we still need a patch if we change to a Filter solution as 
I just described here?
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4046925#4046925


> I have a couple of questions:
> 1) where should the patched cactus jars go?

If we need a patch for cactify I'll push a binary to the web site for 
download.  But we won't check it into the main project unless the Cactus 
team refuses to do a release.

> 2) I would like to get the ant example into svn, but I am a bit unsure
> about a couple of things. Would it be ok to set it up like other ant
> projects and put its dependency jars into svn? Or to set it up to use
> the Maven tasks for ant so that dependencies and such come from the
> maven repo? I currently have it setup as a bit of both (it grabs some of
> the jars from the repo, but it won't download them if they are not in
> the repo).

Yes, we definitely want your ant example in the main project.  I'd 
rather not have any dependent jars in SVN if we can help it.  I don't 
think it adds any value to show developers how to set that part up.

So I would prefer using the Maven tasks for ant to make dependencies 
come from the mave repo.

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Matt Wringe
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jsfunit-dev mailing list
> jsfunit-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jsfunit-dev