[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] Proposal [868-DropCURRENT_COMPONENT CURRENT_COMPOSITE_COMPONENT]
Blake Sullivan
blake.sullivan at oracle.com
Mon Aug 16 23:06:35 EDT 2010
This would needlessly slow down the context attributes implementation,
which is also hammered on.
-- Blake Sullivan
On 8/16/10 9:10 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com
> <mailto:edward.burns at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:46:21 -0400, Kito Mann
> <kito.mann at virtua.com <mailto:kito.mann at virtua.com>> said:
>
> KM> Couldn't you modify the map to return the constant values for the
> KM> proper keys? That way, they would be read-only values that don't
> KM> need to be stored, the Map just needs to know the keys.
>
> I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Can you please
> restate it
> differently?
>
>
> Basically, what I'm saying is that we could change the Map
> implementation to simply delegate to UIComponent.getCurrentComponent()
> and UIComponent.getCurrentCompositeComponent() in the get() method
> whenever the key value is CURRENT_COMPONENT or
> CURRENT_COMPOSITE_COMPONENT. This way we'd save space but would
> maintain backwards compatibility without the switch.
>
>
> Ed
> --
> | edward.burns at oracle.com <mailto:edward.burns at oracle.com> |
> office: +1 407 458 0017
> | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/
> | 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20100816/a9000444/attachment-0002.html
More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror
mailing list