[jsr-314-open-mirror] [jsr-314-open] Proposal [868-DropCURRENT_COMPONENT CURRENT_COMPOSITE_COMPONENT]

Blake Sullivan blake.sullivan at oracle.com
Mon Aug 16 23:06:35 EDT 2010


  This would needlessly slow down the context attributes implementation, 
which is also hammered on.

-- Blake Sullivan

On 8/16/10 9:10 AM, Kito Mann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Ed Burns <edward.burns at oracle.com 
> <mailto:edward.burns at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
>     >>>>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:46:21 -0400, Kito Mann
>     <kito.mann at virtua.com <mailto:kito.mann at virtua.com>> said:
>
>     KM> Couldn't you modify the map to return the constant values for the
>     KM> proper keys? That way, they would be read-only values that don't
>     KM> need to be stored, the Map just needs to know the keys.
>
>     I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean.  Can you please
>     restate it
>     differently?
>
>
> Basically, what I'm saying is that we could change the Map 
> implementation to simply delegate to UIComponent.getCurrentComponent() 
>  and UIComponent.getCurrentCompositeComponent() in the get() method 
> whenever the key value is CURRENT_COMPONENT or 
> CURRENT_COMPOSITE_COMPONENT. This way we'd save space but would 
> maintain backwards compatibility without the switch.
>
>
>     Ed
>     --
>     | edward.burns at oracle.com <mailto:edward.burns at oracle.com> |
>     office: +1 407 458 0017
>     | homepage:               | http://ridingthecrest.com/
>     | 02 work days until JSF 2.1 Milestone 2
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jsr-314-open-mirror/attachments/20100816/a9000444/attachment-0002.html 


More information about the jsr-314-open-mirror mailing list