[keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas

[Bill Burke]

What else is there after this?  THere's nothing major left.

On 7/11/2014 11:21 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> I'm happy to push for this if you think we can still deliver 1.0.final in a reasonable time.
>
> Can we do this in stages? First split ModelProvider into RealmProvider and UserProvider, update cache etc. Then start work on this in a branch? So we can roll 1.0.final without it if it turns out to take to long to delivery?
>
> Would be good to have a Hangout again next week to discuss the next steps!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
>> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>, "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com>
>> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 3:12:41 PM
>> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas
>>
>>
>> On 7/11/2014 9:05 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
>>> This sounds like exactly what we need. There are quite a lot of kinks to
>>> work out though.
>>>
>>
>> My vote is we fix AuthProvider and sync now.  Do another iteration.
>> Users *really* want this.  You're right, there's a lot of kinks we need
>> to work out, but we don't want a large set of users we have to move off
>> of an existing SPI.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Burke
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>>

-- 
Bill Burke
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
http://bill.burkecentral.com