[keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas

[Stian Thorgersen]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>
> Cc: "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com>, keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 4:57:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas
> 
> What else is there after this?  THere's nothing major left.

Yep, only minor things. We can't all work on this though? It'll probably also take a while?

> 
> On 7/11/2014 11:21 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > I'm happy to push for this if you think we can still deliver 1.0.final in a
> > reasonable time.
> >
> > Can we do this in stages? First split ModelProvider into RealmProvider and
> > UserProvider, update cache etc. Then start work on this in a branch? So we
> > can roll 1.0.final without it if it turns out to take to long to delivery?
> >
> > Would be good to have a Hangout again next week to discuss the next steps!
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "Bill Burke" <bburke at redhat.com>
> >> To: "Stian Thorgersen" <stian at redhat.com>, "Marek Posolda"
> >> <mposolda at redhat.com>
> >> Cc: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> >> Sent: Friday, 11 July, 2014 3:12:41 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] sync/federation requirements/ideas
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/11/2014 9:05 AM, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> >>> This sounds like exactly what we need. There are quite a lot of kinks to
> >>> work out though.
> >>>
> >>
> >> My vote is we fix AuthProvider and sync now.  Do another iteration.
> >> Users *really* want this.  You're right, there's a lot of kinks we need
> >> to work out, but we don't want a large set of users we have to move off
> >> of an existing SPI.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Bill Burke
> >> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> >> http://bill.burkecentral.com
> >>
> 
> --
> Bill Burke
> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
> http://bill.burkecentral.com
>