[keycloak-dev] Hawkular requirements (was Re: RFC: organizations)

Stian Thorgersen stian at redhat.com
Wed Jul 29 03:57:00 EDT 2015

Can you not just add a realm role to represent an "organization"?

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juraci Paixão Kröhling" <juraci at kroehling.de>
> To: keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 9:48:45 AM
> Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Hawkular requirements (was Re: RFC:	organizations)
> On 07/28/2015 06:08 PM, Bill Burke wrote:
> > I think it is appropriate to model resource access separately, outside
> > of Keycloak.  The reason for this is basically how SAML/OIDC and single
> > sign in works.  It should be:
> Indeed. Which is basically what we have today. But if Organizations were
> something that would be implemented in Keycloak, I could focus on
> Operations/Resources/Permissions, while Organizations/Roles/Users would
> still be managed by Keycloak. But I'm afraid that our use case is too
> specific to be useful to the community as a whole, even if we take only
> the organization part into consideration.

> - Juca.
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev

More information about the keycloak-dev mailing list