[keycloak-dev] Authz Model Implementation

[Pedro Igor Silva]

Yeah, I've talked with Bolek as well and we discussed about focusing on JPA (which I was already using) for now, but still provide a SPI for future implementations.

>From a SPI perspective, I did something very simple without KC's org.keycloak.provider.Spi. The main reason for this decision is that Spis in KC are not loaded when defined within a custom provider and I'm trying to minimize changes in KC itself.

However, if necessary, I can provide some minor changes to make that happen. So Spis can also be loaded from custom providers.

Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stian Thorgersen" <sthorger at redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva at redhat.com>
Cc: "keycloak dev" <keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 5:15:56 AM
Subject: Re: [keycloak-dev] Authz Model Implementation

For now - which ever you want. I propose you introduce a new SPI though.
Once it's beyond a POC then both :/

On 14 October 2015 at 15:40, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>     Would like to know your thoughts about which model implementations I
> must support for the authz model. Both Database/JPA and MongoDB ?
>
> Regards.
> Pedro Igor
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>