[keycloak-dev] i18n for examples

[Lennart Jörelid]

That is - in itself - a problem for an application with works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?

// vänlig hälsning,
// [sw: "best regards"],
//
// Lennart Jörelid

> 15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>:
> 
> Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide internationalization of applications themselves.
> 
>> On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I would rather keep them simple.
>> 
>> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would fit.
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Wondering...
>> >
>> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>> >
>> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it?  Right now,
>> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
>> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20150915/bf7d711f/attachment.html