[keycloak-dev] i18n for examples

[Stian Thorgersen]

Got no clue what you're saying

On 15 September 2015 at 13:35, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jorelid at gmail.com>
wrote:

> That is - in itself - a problem for an application with
> works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
>
> // vänlig hälsning,
> // [sw: "best regards"],
> //
> // Lennart Jörelid
>
> 15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen <sthorger at redhat.com>:
>
> Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
> internationalization of applications themselves.
>
> On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I would rather keep them simple.
>>
>> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would
>> fit.
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Wondering...
>> >
>> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
>> >
>> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it?  Right now,
>> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > keycloak-dev mailing list
>> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> keycloak-dev mailing list
>> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20150915/8d598be0/attachment.html