[keycloak-dev] Should we remove links from users when identityProvider is removed?

[Stian Thorgersen]

My vote goes to keep. In the future we should add batch operations for
users and one thing we could support is remove identity provider links.
On 21 Mar 2016 5:39 p.m., "Marek Posolda" <mposolda at redhat.com> wrote:

> Currently when identity (social) provider is removed, the federated
> links on linked users are not removed. It means that we may end with
> user records in DB, which are linked to non-existent identity provider.
>
> On the other hand, the advantage of current behaviour is, that when
> admin user accidentally removes facebook provider and then he decides to
> add it back (or just use another clientId/clientSecret or change
> configuration) the facebook links of users are still alive.
>
> So should we remove the links or rather keep as it is and not remove them?
>
> Marek
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160321/ccfdee71/attachment-0001.html