[keycloak-dev] Documentation updates

[Stian Thorgersen]

It's a bit confusing, but Keycloak server is still technically a war under
the covers, that's why setting it like that works. I wonder if we could
just rename the war to drop the war extension and then it would just be
"keycloak-server" and we could remove all the talk about war and name
changes.

On 24 May 2016 at 10:53, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Because today we no longer distribute/deploy war files to get Keycloak up
> and
> running, but I can be wrong and totally missing the point here. Also, I
> couldn't
> find any reference at the docs to deploy that WAR, or generate it with
> -Pdistribution.
>
>
> On 2016-05-24, Stian Thorgersen wrote:
> > We're completely redoing the docs at the moment.
> >
> > Why do you say that section is not valid, at a quick glance it looks ok
> to
> > me.
> >
> > On 23 May 2016 at 22:10, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Ahoy, I was looking at 3.4 section from our docs (
> > >
> https://keycloak.github.io/docs/userguide/keycloak-server/html/server-installation.html
> ).
> > > I believe this section is no longer valid, right?
> > >
> > > If yes, I'm planning to remove it or should we replace with some
> > > alternative?
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > abstractj
> > > PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> > >
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-dev/attachments/20160524/fd7b0523/attachment.html