[keycloak-dev] All PR's failing
Marek Posolda
mposolda at redhat.com
Wed Aug 7 08:46:24 EDT 2019
Thanks Hynek! I've approved the PR 6222 for run adapter authorization
tests conditionally. It seems this helped to have travis green again -
we will see if some more work is needed. My vote is to merge it ASAP.
Marek
On 06. 08. 19 10:39, Hynek Mlnarik wrote:
> Requested Travis assistance as well [1]. There are now several
> timeouts caused by compilation of keycloak taking too long, e.g. [2]
>
> [1] https://travis-ci.community/t/travis-builds-fail-due-to-slowness/4571
> [2] https://travis-ci.org/keycloak/keycloak/jobs/568226589
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:56 AM Hynek Mlnarik <hmlnarik at redhat.com
> <mailto:hmlnarik at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Travis seems inconsistent re the times so better safe than sorry.
> Hence I've reopened Bruno's PR [1] for splitting adapter tests,
> but at the same time, I'd rather excluded authorization tests
> completely since they take most of the time of adapter tests, and
> only included those when appropriate [2].
>
> However I'm not convinced that any of these PRs would help. I have
> just cancelled a build stuck in the very early stage of the build
> for almost 20 minutes (git clone, specifically "remote: Counting
> objects: 100% (14222/14222), done." before build) which points to
> infrastructure rather than testsuite issue.
>
> --Hynek
>
> [1] https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6221
> [2] https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6222
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:38 PM Marek Posolda <mposolda at redhat.com
> <mailto:mposolda at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 05. 08. 19 19:13, Stan Silvert wrote:
> > On 8/5/2019 3:43 AM, Hynek Mlnarik wrote:
> >> The PRs are blocked by two issues:
> >> 1) Adapter tests sometimes take too much time: This should be
> >> addressed by (now merged) [1]
> >> 2) OpenShiftTokenReviewEndpointTest being unstable,
> addressed by [2]
> >>
> >> IIRC, we had issues with Travis caches [3, 4], but if there
> is time it
> >> might be worth checking whether the issues persist.
> >>
> >> Once [2] is merged, Travis should be stable again for
> rebased PRs.
> > Do we know when this is going to happen?
>
> PR is approved by Hynek and me, but travis didn't pass for the
> PR due
> the adapter tests exceed the 50 minutes limit. I am retrying
> one more time.
>
> I agree with what Bruno's suggested to split adapter tests
> into more
> groups. Or fix adapter tests to not require realm re-import
> after each
> test as that take significant amount of time. See [1]. But
> that will
> probably require some more changes and may be probably few
> days of work...
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/master/testsuite/integration-arquillian/tests/base/src/test/java/org/keycloak/testsuite/adapter/AbstractAdapterTest.java#L124-L128
>
> Marek
>
>
> >
> >> --Hynek
> >>
> >> [1] https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6209
> >> [2] https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6207
> >> [3] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-5124
> >> [4] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-7285
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:52 PM Bruno Oliveira
> <bruno at abstractj.org <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>
> >> <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org <mailto:bruno at abstractj.org>>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Before answer this e-mail I was doing some experiments
> and there are
> >> some things that I identified we can do about this.
> >>
> >> 1. Enable cache again on Travis
> >>
> >> That won't fix the issue, but may help
> >>
> >> 2. Split the adapter tests
> >>
> >> I did some test with the following PR:
> >> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/pull/6221/files
> >>
> >> Here's the output:
> >> https://travis-ci.org/keycloak/keycloak/builds/567252894
> >>
> >> 3. Review the tests we run on Travis
> >>
> >> I'm not so sure if everything that we have running on
> Travis today is
> >> really required.
> >>
> >>
> >> For now if others agree on item 2, I can polish my PR
> and work to
> >> get it merged.
> >>
> >> On 2019-08-02, Stan Silvert wrote:
> >> > The adapter tests are timing out on all new PR's.
> >> >
> >> > Hynek, I'm told that you might be able to help?
> >> >
> >> > Stan
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> >> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>>
> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> abstractj
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> <mailto:keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
More information about the keycloak-dev
mailing list