[keycloak-dev] Running Node.js tests with Chrome instead of Phantomjs

[Stian Thorgersen]

+1 as long as chrome-headless works everywhere I'd rather see that as the
default and stop using phantom-js and htmlunit (or whatever it's called).
>From looking at this a looooong time ago I seem to remember chrome-headless
was faster than everything else.

On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 08:51, Michal Hajas <mhajas at redhat.com> wrote:

> I created an issue [1] and I will start to work on making it work on
> Travis.
>
> [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/KEYCLOAK-10359
>
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 7:46 PM Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Michal, I'm not against changing the browser used for testing, as
> > long as we keep Travis happy, like Vašek mentioned.
> >
> > Before we make this decision, I suggest to first isolate the tests and
> > give it a try with some headless browser (maybe chrome-headless). After
> > that, we can decide whether or not we should drop phantomjs.
> >
> > On 2019-05-22, Michal Hajas wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > currently, we are using phantomjs browser for running Node.js tests
> [1].
> > > However, we are experiencing some issues which seem to be caused by
> > > phantomjs, so we are considering to change the default browser from
> > > phantomjs to headless chrome.
> > >
> > > Do you have some objections why not to do so?
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak-nodejs-connect/blob/master/test/utils/webdriver.js#L25
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > > keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
> >
> > --
> >
> > abstractj
> >
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev