[keycloak-user] Accessing authenticated user's details
Christian Hebert
christian_hebert at hotmail.com
Fri Oct 30 13:34:52 EDT 2015
How about wrapping your application under a filter (or a valve in JBoss or Tomcat) ? From there you could populate your authenticated subject (or the session?) with whatever information your keycloak token could provide.
Would that be a good idea ?
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 05:01:17 -0700
From: sthorger at redhat.com
To: tdudgeon.ml at gmail.com
CC: keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [keycloak-user] Accessing authenticated user's details
Yes, JavaEE currently has no standard way of obtaining a user profile.
On 28 October 2015 at 04:17, Tim Dudgeon <tdudgeon.ml at gmail.com> wrote:
So if I understand correctly the only way to handle multiple
attributes of the user (e.g name and email) is to use the Keycloak
IDToken approach and so be dependent on the Keycloak implementation
(or create my own API that wraps this)?
Tim
On 26/10/2015 09:24, Marek Posolda
wrote:
If you don't want Keycloak
dependencies, you can use request.getRemoteUser() or
request.getPrincipal().getName() to access just the userId of
authenticated user. If you use "principal-attribute" in
keycloak.json, it will return the configured attribute instead
of userId, so you can receive for example username or email
instead. But that way, you will be able to access just this
single attribute.
Marek
On 26/10/15 09:52, Tim Dudgeon wrote:
Wondered if anyone had any thoughts on this?
On 21/10/2015 12:04, Tim Dudgeon
wrote:
In the case of a web application (e.g. Tomcat app secured by
the keycloak adapter) the web app might need to access details
of the authenticated user (e.g. full name or email).
I've found that this information is available from the session
like this:
KeycloakSecurityContext session =
(KeycloakSecurityContext)request.getAttribute(KeycloakSecurityContext.class.getName());
IDToken idToken = session.getIdToken();
String email = idToken.getEmail();
One issue with this is that all your web apps are tied to
keycloak.
Is this the right way to handle this?
Are there alternatives?
Tim
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/keycloak-user/attachments/20151030/10c546ef/attachment.html
More information about the keycloak-user
mailing list