Re: More control over Bayeux protocol – feature request

[Dai Jun]

Hi Bob,

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Luís M. Costa<luis.m.costa at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>  About the name conventions, I just gave my contribute to discussion in
> another thread.
>
>  I'm not familiar with servlet API model, but the three layer scheme is
> very common. I can agree that low-level connection and session could be
> together. I suggested differently because sessions can out live low-level
> connections.
>  I was thinking in per-request level in a brother sense. I'm ware that
> multiple requests can be sent simultaneously, but those, would constitute a
> single request. But I also believe that  each of the received request, once
> decoded, can be processed individually.

By saying to combine connection and session together, I meat that
connection and session are the same thing in Bayeux. They have same
scope, same client and server. So it's not necessary to abstract
session from connection. Am I missing anything?

>
> Just a thought,
>    Luís M. Costa
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/More-control-over-Bayeux-protocol-feature-request-tp3473901p3573213.html
> Sent from the Netty Developer Group mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-dev mailing list
> netty-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-dev
>



-- 
Best regards,

Dai Jun or Danny Dai(in English) - http://guiwuu.googlepages.com
GTalk: guiwuu at gmail.com | QQ: 93409048 | MSN: guiwuu at hotmail.com |
Twitter: @guiwuu
Sent from Beijing, 11, China
Mike Ditka  - "If God had wanted man to play soccer, he wouldn't have
given us arms." -
http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mike_ditka.html