APR transport

[Dai Jun]

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Trustin Lee <tlee at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Dai Jun <guiwuu at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Trustin Lee <tlee at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Luis,
>>>
>>> At the moment I don't have a plan to implement kqueue support in the
>>> very near future, but I'm interested in supporting FreeBSD definitely.
>>>  Instead of using APR, I'd like to use the simpler libraries like
>>> libevent..
>>
>> I am confused who implement NIO. As I known, JVM implement NIO in
>> different ways in different OS, like epoll in Linux, selector in
>> windows. So JAVA applications just use NIO but not care of
>> implementing of it. But as you discuss, it seems like Netty should be
>> responsible of that. Am I understanding right? Or you are discussing
>> NIO implementing in JVM?
>
> I meant not using NIO but using a JNI-based Netty transport which
> could be better in performance.

Thx, I got it. I just recalled Netty is transport independent, not
only a NIO framework. So cool and powerful. I belive Netty has a
bright future.

>
> — Trustin Lee, http://gleamynode.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> netty-users mailing list
> netty-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/netty-users
>



-- 
-
Best regards,

Dai Jun or Danny Dai in English, http://guiwuu.googlepages.com
GTalk: guiwuu at gmail.com | QQ: 93409048 | MSN: guiwuu at hotmail.com |
Twitter: guiwuu