APR transport

[Trustin Lee]

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Dai Jun <guiwuu at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Trustin Lee <tlee at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi Luis,
>>
>> At the moment I don't have a plan to implement kqueue support in the
>> very near future, but I'm interested in supporting FreeBSD definitely.
>>  Instead of using APR, I'd like to use the simpler libraries like
>> libevent..
>
> I am confused who implement NIO. As I known, JVM implement NIO in
> different ways in different OS, like epoll in Linux, selector in
> windows. So JAVA applications just use NIO but not care of
> implementing of it. But as you discuss, it seems like Netty should be
> responsible of that. Am I understanding right? Or you are discussing
> NIO implementing in JVM?

I meant not using NIO but using a JNI-based Netty transport which
could be better in performance.

— Trustin Lee, http://gleamynode.net/