[resteasy-dev] Future dev plan

Ron Sigal rsigal at redhat.com
Thu May 12 18:23:47 EDT 2016


The fact that certain issues have a Fix Version of 3.0.17.Final is 
somewhat random. Probably the Fix Version was set by the reporter and 
doesn't mean much. I only set a Fix Version when I start to work on an 
issue, or otherwise strongly believe it will get done soon. A more 
important filter, I think, is anything with an Affects Version of 
3.0.1.Final - 3.0.16.Final. Anything else doesn't affect, or isn't know 
to affect, Resteasy 3.


On 05/12/2016 05:42 PM, Alessio Soldano wrote:
> Folks,
> I'd like to organize a bit the work for the future month or such on
> RESTEasy.
> I've created 3.1.0.Beta1 version on jira and started setting that as
> target for some issues / feature requests.
> Please take some time to look at jira, review what's there, self-assign
> / un-assign jiras and schedule them for 3.1.0.Beta1. We should try to
> come up with a reasonable payload for ~ 1 month of development.
> Also note there are currently a lot of jiras scheduled for 3.0.17.Final,
> but it does not look very likely that they'll all be solved in few days
> (that is when we'll release 3.0.17.Final). So please update/reschedule them.
> With more people actively working on the project we should try to use
> JIRA properly for tracking progress on releases.
>
> Thanks
> Alessio
>
> P.S. the comment to use on commits so that they can be automatically
> linked to jiras (I still have to ask for the integration to be enabled
> though, will do that soon) is "[RESTEASY-XYZ] blah blah", including
> square brackets.
>

-- 
My company's smarter than your company (unless you work for Red Hat)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/resteasy-dev/attachments/20160512/4afac831/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the resteasy-dev mailing list