[rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow

[Mark Proctor]

I don't think that startProcess should clear the agenda, as you may have 
ongoing rule executions that are seperate from the ruleflow, or even 
monitoring the various ruleflows that are running.

Mark
Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
> Are you happy for me to continue with the work? I can plug a Factory 
> in to do as you describe. It depends upon your dead-line for "examples"...
>  
> As a side, calling WorkingMemory.startProcess(xxx) doesn't clear the 
> agenda so anything previously scheduled gets run along with the 
> process. Is this by design?
>  
> If so, documenting it (yep, I appreciate where everyone - "the 
> community" - is with that) would have prevented my head scratching 
> last night!
>  
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>     [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Proctor
>     *Sent:* 18 May 2007 02:35
>     *To:* Rules Dev List
>     *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Conway example - update to use ruleflow
>
>     No I only did agenda groups. Key part to the "port" is to share
>     code, so we still have examples for agenda-groups, don't want to
>     loose those. Probalby create a factory of some sort to abstract
>     away the parts in conway that do any rule stuff, so a switch can
>     specify whether the factory is ruleflowgroup or agenda groups.
>
>     Mark
>     Michael Neale wrote:
>>     Hi Michael.
>>
>>     I think Mark was working on a "stateful" conways example (the old
>>     was stateless) - I wasn't sure if he got to using ruleflow (just
>>     check first).
>>
>>     Ruleflow is probably very useful to most people who would have
>>     used agenda-groups - agenda-groups are a stack, which is not
>>     intuitive to most people, but ruleflows are more imperative, so
>>     examples showing that are appreciated. I would almost go as far
>>     as to say that *most* of the time when you want control, you want
>>     ruleflow (you will know if you want agenda). Correct me if I am
>>     wrong, ruleflow is new to me !
>>
>>     Michael.
>>
>>     On 5/16/07, *Anstis, Michael (M.)* <manstis1 at ford.com
>>     <mailto:manstis1 at ford.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Just to let you know I am updating the example to use
>>         ruleflow (it looks like one or more rules are wrong too as
>>         the "glider" doesn't glide, so I'll have a look at these also).
>>
>>         Doesn't look particularly taxing so should have it done very
>>         soon - provided the wife doesn't complain that she's not
>>         seeing much of me in the evenings ;-)
>>
>>         With kind regards,
>>
>>         Mike
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         rules-dev mailing list
>>         rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-dev mailing list
>>     rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>       
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20070518/f9097100/attachment.html