[rules-dev] Re: ruleflow processes

[Mark Proctor]

Makes sense to me, can someone make sure that its serialisable. also 
refactor the I's away from any public interfaces.

Thanks

Mark
Michael Neale wrote:
> Kris, looking at the ruleflow stuff (not the core, but the .rf stuff), 
> I have a suggestion on how to make it more integrated with the 
> ruleset/package structure.
>
> At the moment Ruleflow packages are a seperate entity that is merged 
> into a RuleBase as needed.
>
> Does anyone have any objections if we add the ability to have ruleflow 
> as part of a rule Package itself? (thus when that package is added to 
> the rulebase, all the processes for ruleflow go along with it)? so a 
> ruleflow.rf file for example becomes just another asset like a drl?
>
> Kris? thoughts? downsides?
> No need to change the current API.
>
> Michael