[rules-dev] Drools ReteOO versus Rete

[James Owen]

Edson:

When I run WaltzDB-16 I get only 9K+ rules fired rather than the  
"normal" 21K+ rules fired.  I'm thinking that IF this logic still  
applies THEN that might explain why WaltzDB-16 does not fire the  
requisite number of rules.

SDG
James Owen
Founder October Rules Fest
Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC
http://www.kbsc.com
http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org
Twitter: OctRulesFest
Blogs:
http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]
http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]
http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]

"If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders of  
giants."
Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676

Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants of  
the industry; if only for a week.



On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Edson Tirelli wrote:

>
>     James,
>
>     I believe this was related to Drools 2.
>     What exactly is your problem?
>
>     []s
>     Edson
>
> 2009/8/14 James Owen <jco2009 at att.net>
> Greetings:
>
> Just wondering if this link still applies.  If so, I think I may  
> have found an answer to one of my benchmark problems.
>
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/DROOLS/Rete+Vs+Reteoo
>
> SDG
> James Owen
> Founder October Rules Fest
> Senior Consultant / Architect KBSC
> http://www.kbsc.com
> http://www.OctoberRulesFest.org
> Twitter: OctRulesFest
> Blogs:
> http://JavaRules.blogspot.com [Rulebased Systems Blog]
> http://ORF2009.blogspot.com [October Rules Fest Blog]
> http://exscg.blogspot.com/ [Expert Systems Consulting Group Blog]
>
> "If I have seen a little further it is by standing on the shoulders  
> of giants."
> Sir Isaac Newton in a letter to Robert Hooke, 5 Feb 1676
>
> Come to October Rules Fest and stand on the shoulders of the Giants  
> of the industry; if only for a week.
>
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2009, at 8:21 AM, mrhoden at franklinamerican.com wrote:
>
>> Depending on your number of rules and facts, that amount of memory
>> will likely be a concern. If I had memory requirements like that I
>> would honestly look a clips.
>>
>> -Michael
>>
>> On Aug 13, 2009, at 2:19 AM, Thomas Frenken <Thomas.Frenken at offis.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am interested in running Drools 5 (and especially Drools Fusion)
>>> on a
>>>>> somehow<< resource-constrained device for which only a J2SE 1.4 VM
>>>>> ist
>>> available.
>>>
>>> Since Drools meanwhile requires J2SE 1.5 I thought about backporting
>>> it.
>>> But before I invest so much effort, I got two questions:
>>>
>>> 1) I have downloaded the sourcecode. At a first glance the only
>>> reason for
>>> requiering J2SE 1.5 is the extensive use of generics. In case I  
>>> would
>>> remove all generics from the code, would it be possible to compile
>>> drools
>>> for a J2SE 1.4 VM runtime in general or are there other more hidden
>>> reasons for requiering J2SE 1.5?
>>> 2)  I already meantioned I am planning to run drools on a  
>>> >>somehow<<
>>> resourcen-constrained device. I explicitly used the term >>somehow<<
>>> because I am talking of a device with a 400 Mhz CPU and 256 MB RAM
>>> (some
>>> people might laugh about calling this resource-constrained). How  
>>> about
>>> resource-consumption of drools? Has anyone run drools on a device  
>>> with
>>> similar resources?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>> Thomas Frenken
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
>  Edson Tirelli
>  JBoss Drools Core Development
>  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20090814/f491eacc/attachment-0001.html