[rules-dev] Remove lesson schedule example from Drools Planner
Michael Neale
michael.neale at gmail.com
Fri Dec 25 18:32:04 EST 2009
Good point (in fact that is what I do !) - so yes, perhaps just a
couple of canonical examples are ideal... once features stabilise, let
the examples branch out.
In fact almost 2 examples is probably enough - easier for users and for you !
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> API changes aren't a problem, they are refactored along.
> The problem is keeping the examples up-to-date with the newest
> improvements, such as relativeSelection, StartingSolutionInitializer, ...
>
> Users copy-paste from an example and it's a pity if they don't use the
> best techniques because they started from an older example.
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> Michael Neale schreef:
>> ok with me - what aspects of maintaining examples are hard? api
>> changes? (just want to know for my own purposes)
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Geoffrey De Smet
>> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I am thinking about removing the lesson schedule example from Drools
>>> Planner in order to cut down maintenance on the examples.
>>>
>>> The curriculum course example is a more advanced form of that example.
>>>
>>> Does anyone object to this change?
>>> --
>>> With kind regards,
>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list