[rules-dev] ActivationCancelledEvent / ActivationCancelledCause

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 4 August 2010 10:51, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

>
> CLEAR is the result of a forced cancellation of an activation, either be
> explicitely calling clear or removing a rule.
>
> I agree we could probably split that out and have a KB_MODIFY, so that if
> the activation is cancelled as a result the rule being removed we get a
> different event.
>
>
Just wanted to point this out - removing rules is not what *we* here need to
do. It probably only matters when you want to write a nit-picking event
logger.

-W



> Mark
>
>
> Is this intentional?
>
> -W
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100804/7434ca85/attachment.html