[rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

[Michael Neale]

no I think it was more that OS-X finder would unzip the zip, and then unzip
the war, and you end up with a drools-guvnor directory... confuses people.

Distributing it as a war makes sense.

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:59 PM, Anstis, Michael (M.) <manstis1 at ford.com>wrote:

>  So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
>
> (Says he with little experience of maven packaging)
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Neale
> *Sent:* 05 August 2010 11:47
> *To:* Rules Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
> namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>
> yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I know
> tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the web
> context or rename when deploying !).
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>wrote:
>
>>  On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
>> > I like the new format - I like version numbers in filenames so you can
>> > differentiate.
>> >
>> > I can always change the web-context at deployment time if I like.
>> Previuosly it was
>> drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
>>  -- drools-guvnor.war
>>
>> So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war wasn't. I didn't see
>> the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back to that, so the
>> main download artifact is versioned, but the war isn't....
>>
>> Mark
>>  > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>> > [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Mark Proctor
>> > Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
>> > To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedas
>> > drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
>> >
>> >
>> >    On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
>> >> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named as
>> >> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to change the default url
>> >> to things like http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
>> >> mistake or intended?
>> > Previously it was a versioned zip that had an unversioned war in it. As
>> > a war is already compressed it seemed pointless compressing it in
>> > another archive.
>> >
>> > Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping the version. Or
>> > we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of the .zip.
>> >
>> > What do people want?
>> >
>> > Mark
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Jervis
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-dev mailing list
>> >> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael D Neale
> home: www.michaelneale.net
> blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>


-- 
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100805/35c4d3e6/attachment.html