[rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?

[Anstis, Michael (M.)]

So, <artifact>-<version>.war without zip then?
 
(Says he with little experience of maven packaging) 


________________________________

	From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
	Sent: 05 August 2010 11:47
	To: Rules Dev List
	Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedasdrools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
	
	
	yeah zipping the war sometimes caused hassles for OS-X users (I
know tripped me up) so its a good thing to do this (but want to set the
web context or rename when deploying !).
	
	
	On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Mark Proctor
<mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
	

		 On 05/08/2010 11:18, Anstis, Michael (M.) wrote:
		> I like the new format - I like version numbers in
filenames so you can
		> differentiate.
		>
		> I can always change the web-context at deployment time
if I like.
		
		Previuosly it was
		drools-guvnor-5.1.0.zip
		 -- drools-guvnor.war
		
		So the zip was versioned, just the contained .war
wasn't. I didn't see
		the point in zipping a single war. But I can move back
to that, so the
		main download artifact is versioned, but the war
isn't....
		
		Mark
		
		> -----Original Message-----
		> From: rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org
		> [mailto:rules-dev-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf
Of Mark Proctor
		> Sent: 05 August 2010 11:15
		> To: rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		> Subject: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor 5.1 war file is now
namedas
		> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war?
		>
		>
		>    On 05/08/2010 10:11, Jervis Liu wrote:
		>> Hi, just found that Guvnor 5.1 war file is now named
as
		>> drools-5.1.0-guvnor.war? This way users have to
change the default url
		>> to things like
http://localhost:8080/drools-5.1.0-guvnor. Is this a
		>> mistake or intended?
		> Previously it was a versioned zip that had an
unversioned war in it. As
		> a war is already compressed it seemed pointless
compressing it in
		> another archive.
		>
		> Users can just rename the .war if they like, stripping
the version. Or
		> we can change it back to placing hte .war inside of
the .zip.
		>
		> What do people want?
		>
		> Mark
		>> Cheers,
		>> Jervis
		>>
		>> _______________________________________________
		>> rules-dev mailing list
		>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
		>>
		>>
		>
		> _______________________________________________
		> rules-dev mailing list
		> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
		>
		> _______________________________________________
		> rules-dev mailing list
		> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
		>
		>
		
		
		_______________________________________________
		rules-dev mailing list
		rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
		https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
		




	-- 
	Michael D Neale
	home: www.michaelneale.net
	blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
	

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20100805/7be9232b/attachment-0001.html