[rules-dev] Drools 5.2.0-SNAPSHOT: NoSuchMethodError => Drools broken
Geoffrey De Smet
ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com
Tue Mar 22 17:07:45 EDT 2011
Jari also encountered this problem.
The problem is caused by nexus having recent drools-core snapshots and
old drools-compiler snapshots (as the second fails).
0) We cannot revert to a previous working timestamp, because there is no
working timestamp since the artifacts have been renamed (=split-up).
1) As a workaround there's been decided to /deploy test-failing
snapshots of drools-compiler, drools-decisiontables, drools-verifier, .../
Most of the tests work. This situation will give a similar experience as
when we had the monolithic build and there were test failures in
drools-compiler on trunk.
Let's hope hudson is blue soon.
2) The bigger issue is that /drools-core should not be deployed if
drools-compiler fails/.
Once hudson decently supports maven 3 jobs, I 'll fix that.
Op 13-03-11 14:40, Geoffrey De Smet schreef:
> Laird,
>
> We're alive and you're not alone at all :)
> We 're all waiting on Edson and Mark to fix this for us.
> Guvnor and droolsjbpm-tools (=eclipse plugin) are also broken meanwhile.
>
> The root of the problem is that both Mark and Edson were working on
> big changes when the clearly announced split-up had to be executed.
> The unfinished problems of those 2 big changes multiplied against each
> other and they 've been working on getting them fixed in the last few
> weeks.
>
> Because the split-up renamed a lot of artefacts etc, it's not
> practical to use guvnor/droolsjbpm-tool on the latest working snapshots.
>
> Since recently, drools-core is testing successfully, but
> drools-compiler isn't, so only the former is deployed, so this is also
> annoying,
> I am investigating that part:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5196203/configure-a-hudson-maven-job-to-keep-building-if-there-are-test-failures-but-onl
>
> Op 11-03-11 20:00, Esteban Aliverti schreef:
>> Drools trunk has been unstable from some weeks now. According to
>> Hudson ( https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/view/Drools%20jBPM/) it has
>> been never built since the codebase was split up.
>> I think hudson should be green soon. But you are not the only one
>> waiting for it :)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>>
>> Esteban Aliverti
>> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com <http://www.plugtree.com>
>> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:54 PM, ljnelson <ljnelson at gmail.com
>> <mailto:ljnelson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Just checking in to see if anyone is alive on this list;
>> downloaded a new
>> drools-core SNAPSHOT today which did not fix the problem.
>>
>> Best,
>> Laird
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Drools-5-2-0-SNAPSHOT-NoSuchMethodError-tp2660470p2666004.html
>> Sent from the Drools - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
--
With kind regards,
Geoffrey De Smet
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110322/6369f3db/attachment.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list