[rules-dev] Guvnor MVEL problem on Guvnor master?
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Sun May 8 22:03:07 EDT 2011
On 08/05/2011 14:16, Geoffrey De Smet wrote:
> Looks like kris found the real cause why you didn't get the latest
> mvel snapshot as needed:
> https://github.com/droolsjbpm/jbpm/commit/23339ee970843066e7eaa8e625c4a096edc562a6#L1L66
>
> I agree we should strongly prefer not to use mvel snapshot's if we can
> avoid it (which we can't for this release :( ).
We'd need to do some preliminary testing agains the snapshot anyway,
before we can push a release. Otherwise you are releasing for every
single issue you find in MVEL.
Mark
>
> Op 07-05-11 18:31, Antoine Toulme schreef:
>> We really only care about jBPM, and as of now, we build it against
>> M2. M2 was depending on mvel snapshot, so it started breaking when
>> new snapshots were introduced.
>>
>> I am not a big believer in snapshots for coordinating complex
>> products like Drools with many moving pieces. I voiced this to Mark
>> in the past, and I need to discuss this with you when we have time.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 08:42, Geoffrey De Smet
>> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Antoine :)
>> It's a good experiment.
>>
>> Just hope it doesn't complicate things as the mvel snapshots
>> change API regularly and our snapshots are adjusted regularly to
>> cope with those API changes.
>>
>> Op 07-05-11 09:10, Antoine Toulme schreef:
>>> It is by no means going to help in any way for you to release.
>>> This is just meant for us to be able to build and run Drools
>>> while you guys figure out a solution.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Antoine
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 23:54, Geoffrey De Smet
>>> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This nights mvel snapshot fixes jbpm (the one from 3-MAY
>>> doesn't afaik).
>>> Does that release (it's not a snapshot) include those latest
>>> changes?
>>>
>>> Not that I 've not been tempted (or pressured from Mark) to
>>> try to release mvel myself to move away from the snapshot,
>>> but without tag of the source code in git, without a "yes,
>>> this revision is ok" from Mike (the mvel lead), etc
>>> this isn't the kind of dependency we want to include in the
>>> final release and support for 5 to 7 years.
>>>
>>> Op 06-05-11 20:04, Antoine Toulme schreef:
>>>> We pushed out this snapshot with a version for now:
>>>> http://www.intalio.org/public/maven2/org/mvel/mvel2/2.1/mvel2-2.1-intalio.jar
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 03:51, Geoffrey De Smet
>>>> <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com <mailto:ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hudson hasn't been reliable the last couple of days,
>>>> this might have something do with it as you might not
>>>> have the latest snapshots of everything.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore, the mvel snapshot has been changed from
>>>> 1-MAY to 3-MAY
>>>> https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/index.html#nexus-search;gav~org.mvel~mvel2~2.1-SNAPSHOT~~
>>>> <https://repository.jboss.org/nexus/index.html#nexus-search;gav%7Eorg.mvel%7Emvel2%7E2.1-SNAPSHOT%7E%7E>
>>>> But I don't think that's it.
>>>> As soon as a new mvel release is out, I 'll switch us
>>>> to it. We can't use the current latest mvel release.
>>>>
>>>> Op 06-05-11 12:20, Leonardo Gomes schreef:
>>>>> I will try to delete mvel stuff from my repository at
>>>>> home tonight to see if it fixes the problem. If not,
>>>>> here's a suggestion from Antoine:
>>>>>
>>>>> We suffered the same problem, the temporary
>>>>> workaround is to use an older snapshot:
>>>>>
>>>>> You can pick this one:
>>>>> http://www.intalio.org/public/maven2/org/mvel/mvel2/2.1-SNAPSHOT/mvel2-2.1-20110328.204856-23.jar
>>>>>
>>>>> I hope it helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Antoine
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Leo.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Michael Anstis
>>>>> <michael.anstis at gmail.com
>>>>> <mailto:michael.anstis at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I pulled, rebased just now and it's OK here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have deleted my mvel entries in maven recently
>>>>> though, I think Wolfgang and Leo have had issues
>>>>> with different versions in their local repos.
>>>>>
>>>>> With kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> Mike
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 6 May 2011 08:50, Jervis Liu <jliu at redhat.com
>>>>> <mailto:jliu at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like MVEL lib is screwed up on master.
>>>>> Tried to run test scenario
>>>>> Good Credit History Only, it failed with
>>>>> following errors:
>>>>>
>>>>> Unable to rebuild the rulebase.
>>>>> org.drools.rule.MVELDialectRuntimeData; local
>>>>> class incompatible: stream
>>>>> classdesc serialVersionUID =
>>>>> 8808844570772337501, local class
>>>>> serialVersionUID = 2609855281272796208
>>>>>
>>>>> Jervis
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With kind regards,
>>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>> --
>>> With kind regards,
>>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>> --
>> With kind regards,
>> Geoffrey De Smet
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> --
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20110509/b5da9724/attachment-0001.html
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list