[rules-dev] A syntax for rules

[Mark Proctor]

I would add that pluggable parsers to investigate alternative rule 
language design ontop of Drools is perfectly acceptable, and probaby 
desirable. Any parser should be able to map to the descr tree.

I'm happy to look into how we can make pluggable parsers more of an end 
users feature, if there are people out there that want to have a go at 
designing and writting their own rule language.

Mark
On 25/07/2012 09:00, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20120725/99f42352/attachment.html