[rules-dev] 3rd party jars

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 07/03/2012, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> quartz should be an optional jar only needed if you wish to adapt
> existing quartz calendars. Otherwise you can just write your own
> calendars against our own interface.

Well, put this and the (up-to-date) URL for downloading quartz into
the readme - that's all I wanted to suggest.
-W



>
> Mark
> On 07/03/2012 09:41, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>> Is there a standard procedure for Drools releases, regulating whether
>> they contain 3rd party jars that are essential for core (!) functions
>> of Drools?
>>
>> For example: After downloading and installing 5.3.0, I tried to use a
>> rule calendar, but there's no "quartz" to be found in all the *.jar
>> files in /drools-distribution-5.3.0.Final/binaries.
>>
>> Downloading quartz is no problem, but it would be NICE if there were a
>> hint in the ReadMeDrools.txt. (And what else is required but not
>> included?)
>>
>> -W
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>