[rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

[Wolfgang Laun]

@Nasir,
(1) Even being very new, you might have noted that this rule based system
is called "Drools", not "drool".
(2) You have used the list for Drools developers. Use the rules Users list:
rules-users at lists.jboss.org.
(3) You have hijacked a thread discussing something not related to your
problem. Don't do that.
(4) I may be mistaken but I don't think that what you have written doesn't
make any sense, at least it doesn't to me. Make sure to get the basic
vocabulary right.
-W








On 10 April 2013 20:50, Nasir Ali <Nasirgoe at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear All,
> I am new to  use drool. Since I have a large number of packages, is there
> any Way that I Upload
> facts on One Place (e.g. Global area) and Share it in all packages.
>
> I shall be thankful for your help.
>
> Best Regards,
> Nasir
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 10.04.2013, at 20:24, Alexandre Porcelli <porcelli at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> +1 for IWB
>
> On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
> Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?
>
> Mark
> On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I will be starting the split tomorrow.
>
>
>
> On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>> studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with
>> something they prefer in the RHT product names.
>>
>> We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under
>> IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement
>> and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.
>>
>> Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's
>> thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search
>> for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This
>> framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.
>>
>> IDE - Integrated Development Environment
>> IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.
>> IWB - Integrated WorkBench
>> AWD - Advanced WorkBench
>>
>> Mark
>>
>> On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"
>> >> instead of "Environment"?
>> >>
>> >
>> > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
>> > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
>> >
>> > -W
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-dev mailing list
>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130410/04dc6cdc/attachment.html