[rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

[Nasir Ali]

@Wolfgang
1. I think, it is a common sense. When I write here drool, everyone can understand that it is drools. There is no drool, which make confusion.
2.  thanks, I will post my issue there
3. you are right but i was not aware about the userlist. thanks for information
4. for me, it definitely make sense w.r.t. reusability and easy to use.

Regards,
Nasir

--- Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> schrieb am Do, 11.4.2013:

Von: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
Betreff: Re: [rules-dev] Guvnor split-up
An: "Rules Dev List" <rules-dev at lists.jboss.org>
Datum: Donnerstag, 11. April, 2013 00:23 Uhr

@Nasir,
(1) Even being very new, you might have noted that this rule based system is called "Drools", not "drool".
(2) You have used the list for Drools developers. Use the rules Users list: rules-users at lists.jboss.org.

(3) You have hijacked a thread discussing something not related to your problem. Don't do that.
(4) I may be mistaken but I don't think that what you have written doesn't make any sense, at least it doesn't to me. Make sure to get the basic vocabulary right.

-W









On 10 April 2013 20:50, Nasir Ali <Nasirgoe at yahoo.com> wrote:

Dear All,I am new to  use drool. Since I have a large number of packages, is there any Way that I Upload 
facts on One Place (e.g. Global area) and Share it in all packages.
I shall be thankful for your help.
Best Regards,Nasir

Sent from my iPad

On 10.04.2013, at 20:24, Alexandre Porcelli <porcelli at redhat.com> wrote:

+1 for IWB 

On Apr 10, 2013, at 3:19 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?

Mark
On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

I will be starting the split tomorrow.



On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:


studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with something they prefer in the RHT product names.





We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.



Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.





IDE - Integrated Development Environment

IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.

IWB - Integrated WorkBench

AWD - Advanced WorkBench



Mark



On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:



> On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

>> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"

>> instead of "Environment"?

>>

>

> Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.

> Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?

>

> -W

> _______________________________________________

> rules-dev mailing list

> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org

> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev





_______________________________________________

rules-dev mailing list

rules-dev at lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev at lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
_______________________________________________


rules-dev mailing list

rules-dev at lists.jboss.org

https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev



-----Integrierter Anhang folgt-----

_______________________________________________
rules-dev mailing list
rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130410/8c216481/attachment-0001.html