[rules-dev] Usage of rules-users

[Wolfgang Laun]

IIRC, absolute beginners' question aren't making the list
inhomogeneous. (Poor netiquette is not necessarily a Drools beginner's
symptom.) I think that separating vertically (planner,
guvnor/workbench, expert+fusion) is the way to go.

This is also (roughly) the way (most) Qs are answered: by Geoffrey,
Michael, and others.

Cheers
Wolfgang



On 14/05/2014, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> I've asked geoffrey to setup a separate mailing list for planner, and to
> write on the optaplanner website what questions should not be asked on the
> Drools lists.
>
> We can setup an additional two new google groups for Drools. One for expert
> DRL questions and one for Workbench questions. Or maybe we just need to
> create a drools-noob list, and direct first starters there? That may
> actually be the best way for now, to reduce some of the most basic Qs.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On 13 May 2014, at 09:47, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> the amount of (what is) noise (to me) on the users list has steadily
>> increased over time. Several distinct topics appear (to me) to be
>> bunched together needlessly, and I'm beginning to use interest in this
>> list. IIRC, there was some talk several months ago, that things like
>> planner, JBPM and Guvnor should have their own lists, but nothing has
>> come of that.
>>
>> Best
>> Wolfgang
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>