AW: [rules-users] retract() problem

[Guardian]

I will try to specify my problem:

I think every insert()-action leads to a refresh of the agenda. The same
should be happen if an object would be retracted, but it don’t. 

There are 10 objects in the workingMemory and in this constellation no rules
will be fired. This is the expected behaviour and the agenda is empty. Now I
retract 2 objects from the workingMemory. I proofed that the 2 objects are
deleted from the workingMemory.  Afterwards fireallrules() is executed and
the rule should be fired, but the agenda is also empty. 

The rule is tested: it works. When I insert only 8 objects at the beginning
everything works fine. 

 

 

Thanks a lot

Dennis Jansen

 

  _____  

Von: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Edson Tirelli
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2007 12:05
An: Rules Users List
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] retract() problem

 


   You did not provided enough information on this for us to help. 
   NOT and EXIST are existential CE and reason over presence or absence of
facts and they work fine.

   []s
   Edson



2007/12/18, Guardian <d.h.j. at gmx.de>:

Hi all, 
The problem is, if i retract some objects (EJB3.0 entities) from my
workingMemory the agenda wont´t be refreshed. There are rules that should be
fired if the objects are retracted from the workingMemory, but nothing 
happens.

Thanks,
Dennis Jansen


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20071221/a53fb9f4/attachment.html