[rules-users] Arbitrary problem using OR?

[wasabifan]

Sure.  Here is one example (though I think it may have an
existential/universal not error as mentioned in another post):

rule "6040 Pass CA Fees"
	when
		#conditions
		$status : ValidationPassFailStatus()
		exists ValidationControl(validationNo == 6040)
		CiLines($ciNo : ciNo, $ciLineNo : ciLineNo,	$countryOrigin :
countryOrigin)
		Country(country == $countryOrigin, canadianProvince != "",
canadianProvince != "N") 
		(CiLineFees(amtFee == 0, ciNo == $ciNo, ciLineNo == $ciLineNo) 
		or not CiLineFees(ciNo == $ciNo, ciLineNo == $ciLineNo))
	then 
		#actions
		System.out.println("6040 Pass CA Fees");
		$status.passSq(6040);	
end

I have tried this with and without the parenthesis for explicitness.  It
errors out when inserting facts for the rule:

java.lang.ClassCastException:
com.kewill.icustoms.customs.rules.model.ValidationPassFailStatusShadowProxy
	at
org.drools.base.com.kewill.icustoms.dbi.model.CiLines$getCountryOrigin.getValue(Unknown
Source)
	at
org.drools.base.extractors.BaseObjectClassFieldExtractor.getHashCode(BaseObjectClassFieldExtractor.java:139)
	at
org.drools.base.ClassFieldExtractor.getHashCode(ClassFieldExtractor.java:173)
	at org.drools.rule.Declaration.getHashCode(Declaration.java:272)
	at
org.drools.util.AbstractHashTable$SingleIndex.hashCodeOf(AbstractHashTable.java:489)
	at
org.drools.util.TupleIndexHashTable.getOrCreate(TupleIndexHashTable.java:280)
	at org.drools.util.TupleIndexHashTable.add(TupleIndexHashTable.java:192)
	at org.drools.reteoo.JoinNode.assertTuple(JoinNode.java:111)
        ...

However, if I break this into two separate rules, it behaves as expected
(with the possible existensial/universal logic problem I mention above).

rule "6040 Pass CA Fees"
	when
		#conditions
		$status : ValidationPassFailStatus()
		exists ValidationControl(validationNo == 6040)
		CiLines($ciNo : ciNo, $ciLineNo : ciLineNo,	$countryOrigin :
countryOrigin)
		Country(country == $countryOrigin, canadianProvince != "",
canadianProvince != "N") 
		CiLineFees(amtFee == 0, ciNo == $ciNo, ciLineNo == $ciLineNo) 
	then 
		#actions
		System.out.println("6040 Pass CA Fees");
		$status.passSq(6040);	
end

rule "6040 Pass CA No Fees"
	when
		#conditions
		$status : ValidationPassFailStatus()
		exists ValidationControl(validationNo == 6040)
		CiLines($ciNo : ciNo, $ciLineNo : ciLineNo,	$countryOrigin :
countryOrigin)
		Country(country == $countryOrigin, canadianProvince != "",
canadianProvince != "N") 
		not CiLineFees(ciNo == $ciNo, ciLineNo == $ciLineNo) 
	then 
		#actions
		System.out.println("6040 Pass CA No Fees");
		$status.passSq(6040);	
end



Edson Tirelli-3 wrote:
> 
> 
>    As we speak, there is no known problem in the use of this functionality
> in 4.0.1.
> 
>    Can you please provide an example of the problems you are finding?
> 
>    Thanks,
>      Edson
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Arbitrary-problem-using-OR--tf4481210.html#a12779845
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.