[rules-users] import statements and performance

[ekke]

do import statements have any impact on the performance of a .drl or .rfm ?

I plan to make some templates (.drl and .rfm) to use by the business guys -
from my UML model I know which entities were used from which Services,
so I can pre-configure a .drl/.rfm for each service (= drool package) and
its easier for the business guys to create Rules. they know that there are
orders, offers, addresses etc. but they have no knowledge about java package
structures

but then it will be that there are many unused import statements - I think
this would create no runtime - performance issues. am I right ?

and then I've noticed that Drools supports import a.b.c.* which means all
classes from package a.b.c were known, but not from subpackages like
a.b.c.d.e. there's nothing in the docs - so I obly want to confirm that this
is right. (inside the BRMS I noticed that .* was not supported with import
statements)

thanks for info

ekke
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/import-statements-and-performance-tf4511270.html#a12866596
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.