[rules-users] import statements and performance

[Edson Tirelli]

   Yes, there should be no noticeable runtime perf impact.

   []s
   Edson

2007/9/24, ekke <ekkehard at gentz-software.de>:
>
>
> do import statements have any impact on the performance of a .drl or .rfm
> ?
>
> I plan to make some templates (.drl and .rfm) to use by the business guys
> -
> from my UML model I know which entities were used from which Services,
> so I can pre-configure a .drl/.rfm for each service (= drool package) and
> its easier for the business guys to create Rules. they know that there are
> orders, offers, addresses etc. but they have no knowledge about java
> package
> structures
>
> but then it will be that there are many unused import statements - I think
> this would create no runtime - performance issues. am I right ?
>
> and then I've noticed that Drools supports import a.b.c.* which means all
> classes from package a.b.c were known, but not from subpackages like
> a.b.c.d.e. there's nothing in the docs - so I obly want to confirm that
> this
> is right. (inside the BRMS I noticed that .* was not supported with import
> statements)
>
> thanks for info
>
> ekke
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/import-statements-and-performance-tf4511270.html#a12866596
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
  Office: +55 11 3529-6000
  Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
  JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070924/249b073f/attachment.html