[rules-users] Re: licensing text

[Krishnan]

thanks a lot geoffrey.

-Krishnan.

On 9/28/07, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> jxl is http://jexcelapi.sourceforge.net/
> it's not http://sourceforge.net/projects/jxl/
>
> so it's LGPM:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jexcelapi
>
> very confusing indeed :(
> but mvnrepository.com search on "jxl" explains why:
>
> #  net.sourceforge.jexcelapi » jxl
>
> jxl - JExcelApi is a java library which provides the ability to read,
> write, and modify Microsoft Excel spreadsheets.
>
>
>
> With kind regards,
> Geoffrey De Smet
>
> Krishnan schreef:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > I tried to google for jxl-2.4.2.jar and I must say that the site it
> > pointed me towards was the following :-
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jxl/
> >
> > The license for this seems to be GPL. Am I looking at the wrong library,
> > if so can you send me the
> > website for the right library ?. I could not also find any website for
> > core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar  ?.
> >
> > Sorry for the weird request but the legal department at my work is
> > breathing down my throat for using
> > drools which was helpful in solving my technical problem.
> >
> > TIA,
> > Krishnan.
> >
> > On 9/26/07, *Krishnan* <krishiyer at gmail.com
> > <mailto:krishiyer at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     hi,
> >
> >     I am trying to use drools 4.0 for our project and understand the
> >     licensing agreement for drools. Drools
> >     uses Apache license where as some of the dependant libraries use New
> >     BSD and other type of licenses.
> >     Since I am not a lawyer, does anybody have any idea of any
> >     implications on any problems related to
> >     the licenses ?.
> >
> >     Drools use the following libraries
> >
> >     antlr-runtime-3.0.jar
> >     core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar
> >     janino-2.5.7.jar
> >     jsr94-1.1.jar
> >     jxl-2.4.2.jar
> >     mvel14-1.2rc1.jar
> >     xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar
> >     xml-apis-1.0.b2.jar
> >     xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar
> >     xstream-1.1.3.jar
> >
> >     (a) Do you guys have the licensing agreement for each of these jars
> ?
> >     (b) Also, I tried searching for the websites using their name but
> >     some of them I am not able to find. IF you
> >     have the website information for these jars, that will help.
> >     (c) Has anybody run into any particular licensing issue problem with
> >     Drools ?.
> >
> >     Any help is appreciated.
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Krishnan.
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand)
> >
> >     Never assume the obvious is true.
> >     - William Safire
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand)
> >
> > Never assume the obvious is true.
> > - William Safire
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>



-- 
Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand)

Never assume the obvious is true.
- William Safire
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070928/3afba0e5/attachment.html