[rules-users] determinism with rulebase partitioning

[Mark Proctor]

We have rulebase partitioning almost working, this allows parallel 
evaluation of a rulebase. For stateless lessions with no agenda this 
will allow for much faster executions, where you don't care about 
deterministic execution. However for deterministic execution its more 
complicated. The current plan is to have an agenda per parition, which 
means that we no longer have rulebase wide deterministic execution 
order, only with the partition itself. The user is unlikely to be aware 
of the created partitions, so won't be aware of the unditermistic 
behavour of their rulebase. Anyone have any input on mechanisms users 
can do to help the rulebase know what needs to be executed 
deterministically and what doesn't?

Mark