[rules-users] Re: Compilation failed on BRMS with multi-consequence DSL phrase

[Benjamin J McMillan]

Sorry for all the emails. We figured it out. 

It turns out that the guided editor in the BRMS forces the MVEL dialect
by default. However, if you explicitly set the dialect to java in the
options, it will work (validate). This allows us to call functions in
the DSL phrases rather than being limited to getters/setters via MVEL.

Cheers,
(a much happier) Ben

On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:16 -0400, Benjamin J McMillan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:16 -0400, Benjamin J McMillan wrote:
> > So, it seems this only affects the BRMS' guided rule editor.
>
> Apparently, the guided editor's validator only accepts MVEL (bean) style
>
> The text based (DSL assisted) editor successfully validates the java
> style DSL phrase as used in the same rule.