[rules-users] Facts with "from"
Chris Selwyn
chris at selwyn-family.me.uk
Fri Dec 31 08:33:26 EST 2010
I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do :-)
(Isn't english so imprecise?)
(WMEs? Working Memory Entries?)
Chris
On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
>
> On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk
> <mailto:chris at selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
>
> I am trying to understand the usage of "from".
>
> Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get
> asserted into the WM?
>
>
> Yes. (They might happen to be WMEs, if you have inserted them.)
> -W
>
>
> I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like to fetch
> with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM facts
> but I
> do not want the "from" facts to be treated the same as the ones
> that are
> in WM... I do not want them to fire rules that the "normal" WM
> facts would.
>
> Chris
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3349 - Release Date: 12/30/10
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101231/4287be37/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list