[rules-users] Facts with "from"

Chris Selwyn chris at selwyn-family.me.uk
Fri Dec 31 08:33:26 EST 2010


I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do :-) 
(Isn't english so imprecise?)

(WMEs? Working Memory Entries?)

Chris

On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
>
> On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk 
> <mailto:chris at selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
>
>     I am trying to understand the usage of "from".
>
>     Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get
>     asserted into the WM?
>
>
> Yes. (They might happen to be WMEs, if you have inserted them.)
>  -W
>
>
>     I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like to fetch
>     with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM facts
>     but I
>     do not want the "from" facts to be treated the same as the ones
>     that are
>     in WM... I do not want them to fire rules that the "normal" WM
>     facts would.
>
>     Chris
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3349 - Release Date: 12/30/10
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101231/4287be37/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list