[rules-users] Facts with "from"

[Wolfgang Laun]

Hmm, you asked whether "do I take it that...", which I take to mean the same
as "should I assume that...". Hence: yes, you should!

Indirect figures of speech are always suprising if replied to at face value.

Q. "May I ask you how olod you are?"
A. "Yes, you may."

WME = Working Memory Elements.

Cheers
Wolfgang


2010/12/31 Chris Selwyn <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk>

>
> I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do :-)
> (Isn't english so imprecise?)
>
> (WMEs? Working Memory Entries?)
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>
>
>
> On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> I am trying to understand the usage of "from".
>>
>> Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not actually get
>> asserted into the WM?
>>
>
> Yes. (They might happen to be WMEs, if you have inserted them.)
>  -W
>
>>
>> I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like to fetch
>> with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM facts but I
>> do not want the "from" facts to be treated the same as the ones that are
>> in WM... I do not want them to fire rules that the "normal" WM facts
>> would.
>>
>> Chris
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3349 - Release Date: 12/30/10
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101231/51335e17/attachment.html