[rules-users] Facts with "from"

[Chris Selwyn]

Thanks for the confirmation :-)

Happy new year.

Chris

On 31/12/2010 15:14, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> Hmm, you asked whether "do I take it that...", which I take to mean 
> the same as "should I assume that...". Hence: yes, you should!
>
> Indirect figures of speech are always suprising if replied to at face 
> value.
>
> Q. "May I ask you how olod you are?"
> A. "Yes, you may."
>
> WME = Working Memory Elements.
>
> Cheers
> Wolfgang
>
>
> 2010/12/31 Chris Selwyn <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk 
> <mailto:chris at selwyn-family.me.uk>>
>
>
>     I assume that you mean that Yes they don't rather than Yes they do
>     :-) (Isn't english so imprecise?)
>
>     (WMEs? Working Memory Entries?)
>
>     Chris
>
>
>     On 31/12/2010 12:55, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
>>
>>
>>     On 31 December 2010 11:33, Chris Selwyn
>>     <chris at selwyn-family.me.uk <mailto:chris at selwyn-family.me.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>         I am trying to understand the usage of "from".
>>
>>         Do I take it that facts that come from a "from" CE do not
>>         actually get
>>         asserted into the WM?
>>
>>
>>     Yes. (They might happen to be WMEs, if you have inserted them.)
>>      -W
>>
>>
>>         I would like to be sure because the facts that I would like
>>         to fetch
>>         with "from" are actually the same Java class as one of my WM
>>         facts but I
>>         do not want the "from" facts to be treated the same as the
>>         ones that are
>>         in WM... I do not want them to fire rules that the "normal"
>>         WM facts would.
>>
>>         Chris
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         rules-users mailing list
>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>>     No virus found in this message.
>>     Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
>>     Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3349 - Release Date:
>>     12/30/10
>>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
> Version: 10.0.1191 / Virus Database: 1435/3349 - Release Date: 12/30/10
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101231/769e336d/attachment.html