[rules-users] OWL (2 RL) reasoning support

[Mark Proctor]

  On 11/09/2010 09:29, Semweb Developer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> as far as I know, Drools does not support a built-in ruleset for 
> reasoning on OWL (2 RL) in the form of triple-based rules.
> Is there any custom approach towards this field with a publicly 
> available ruleset for Drools?
Davide Sottara is working on OWL support via the Manchester Syntax - we 
don't feel exposing RDF tripples to end users is a good idea.

But if the triples are pojos then you can reason over them on the LHS.

Mark
>
> thanks.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100911/dc320084/attachment.html