[rules-users] drools vs jbpm

Bernd Rücker bernd.ruecker at camunda.com
Tue Sep 21 14:44:37 EDT 2010


Hey!

If you asked for "just" a rule engine, this is nothing available in jBPM
(which is a process engine).

If you asked for processes and workflow then I have a follow up question
for Mark: Is there already any timeline on jBPM 5?

Cheers
Bernd

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Mark Proctor
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2010 19:52
An: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Betreff: Re: [rules-users] drools vs jbpm

  On 21/09/2010 18:07, woods5242-photography at yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi,
> We need a rules engine for our project and I am trying to determine the
main
> differences between Drools and JBPM. Can anyone on here provide a brief
> explanation maybe offering why one is better than the other, chances of
them
> being merged or one being retired over the other?  Are they competing
projects?
Drools Flow will be incorporated into jBPM5. The safest bet for now is
to adopt Drools Flow, as the changes for adoptiong jBPM5 when we release
it will be minimal.

Mark
> thanks!
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



More information about the rules-users mailing list