[rules-users] drools vs jbpm

[Mark Proctor]

  On 21/09/2010 19:44, Bernd Rücker wrote:
> Hey!
>
> If you asked for "just" a rule engine, this is nothing available in jBPM
> (which is a process engine).
>
> If you asked for processes and workflow then I have a follow up question
> for Mark: Is there already any timeline on jBPM 5?
Sometime next year :) There should be minimal api changes from what we 
have now on drools flow, just a bit more separation and modularity on 
the backend code.

Mark
> Cheers
> Bernd
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
> [mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] Im Auftrag von Mark Proctor
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. September 2010 19:52
> An: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Betreff: Re: [rules-users] drools vs jbpm
>
>    On 21/09/2010 18:07, woods5242-photography at yahoo.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> We need a rules engine for our project and I am trying to determine the
> main
>> differences between Drools and JBPM. Can anyone on here provide a brief
>> explanation maybe offering why one is better than the other, chances of
> them
>> being merged or one being retired over the other?  Are they competing
> projects?
> Drools Flow will be incorporated into jBPM5. The safest bet for now is
> to adopt Drools Flow, as the changes for adoptiong jBPM5 when we release
> it will be minimal.
>
> Mark
>> thanks!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>