[rules-users] Drools Performance

[Sumeet Karawal]

Thanks Mark for the reply.

Regards,
Sumeet Karawal

Mailto: sumeet.karawal at tcs.com



                                                                                                                       
  From:       Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>                                                                     
                                                                                                                       
  To:         rules-users at lists.jboss.org                                                                              
                                                                                                                       
  Date:       04/27/2011 05:21 PM                                                                                      
                                                                                                                       
  Subject:    Re: [rules-users] Drools Performance                                                                     
                                                                                                                       
  Sent by:    rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org                                                                      
                                                                                                                       





On 27/04/2011 11:52, Sumeet Karawal wrote:
>
> Thanks Michael for the help. But, is there any benchmark or a rough
figure
> like number of hits or number of rule fired per minute, for normal
> performance.
I can write one rule that runs much slower than something with 1000
rules. So we suggest people do their own real life proof of concepts and
see if they run fast enough.

We tend to avoid benchmarking only because it ends up a focus point
between competitors and all of them cheat making the exercise pointless.

MArk
> Regards,
> Sumeet Karawal
>
> Mailto: sumeet.karawal at tcs.com
>
>
>
>
>    From:       Michael Anstis<michael.anstis at gmail.com>
>
>    To:         Rules Users List<rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>
>    Date:       04/27/2011 04:13 PM
>
>    Subject:    Re: [rules-users] Drools Performance
>
>    Sent by:    rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If you use a stateless session per transaction you should generally be
OK.
>
> How much lag you're likely to encounter is a much harder question to
> answer: how well does your database retrieval scale, would this present
an
> issue before the rules engine?
>
> The rules engine is "just a POJO library" the overall scalability would
IMO
> depend upon your application's architecture.
>
> On 27 April 2011 11:27, Sumeet Karawal<sumeet.karawal at tcs.com>  wrote:
>
>    Hi,
>
>    I have an Application where I have to give the discount to user
according
>    to their profile points.
>
>    i.e. when the user logs in, his profile points are fetched from the
>    database, and respectively he is given the required discount.
>
>    My concern is how many concurrent users will be supported by the rules
>    engine, will there a performance lag if the concurrent number of users
>    exceed a certain limit. Please help me on this as I have no idea
>    regarding
>    this.
>
>    Thanks and Reagrds,
>    Sumeet Karawal
>
>    Mailto: sumeet.karawal at tcs.com
>
>    =====-----=====-----=====
>    Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
>    message and/or attachments to it may contain
>    confidential or privileged information. If you are
>    not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
>    review, distribution, printing or copying of the
>    information contained in this e-mail message
>    and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
>    you have received this communication in error,
>    please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
>    immediately and permanently delete the message
>    and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>
>    _______________________________________________
>    rules-users mailing list
>    rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>    https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> =====-----=====-----=====
> Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
> message and/or attachments to it may contain
> confidential or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
> review, distribution, printing or copying of the
> information contained in this e-mail message
> and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this communication in error,
> please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
> immediately and permanently delete the message
> and any attachments. Thank you
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you